This is the September 2026 edition of the On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
Unique sites3,492
Total scans3,915
Benchmarks / tools1 — On-Page SEO Audit, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 October 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

What changed since August 2026

82 → 74 Median score −8 pts
59% → 31% Scored 80+ −28 pp
8.3 → 11.3 Issues per scan +3.0

The biggest check-level move was “Content-Security-Policy”, which went from 47% in August 2026 to 71% in September 2026 — it went unmet in a larger share of this month’s sample.

Reading a monthly difference. Each month is a separate sample, and its size changes from month to month. A change in sample size can move a median and a distribution by itself, so a monthly difference should not be mistaken for a change in scores: it does not show that sites improved or got worse.

CheckNot met thenNot met nowChange
Content-Security-Policy47%71%+24 pp
Structured data (Schema.org)37%60%+23 pp
Open Graph tags35%58%+23 pp
All images have ALT text45%62%+17 pp
Meta description length (70–160)37%54%+17 pp
Exactly one H133%47%+14 pp
Title length optimal (30–60)41%54%+13 pp
X-Content-Type-Options35%47%+12 pp
Clickjacking protection32%43%+11 pp
Healthy text-to-HTML ratio78%80%+2 pp
Change in the share of scans not meeting each SeoMods check on the On-Page SEO Audit between August 2026 and September 2026
On-Page SEO Audit — check-by-check change from August 2026 to September 2026, in percentage points.

Moves under a point are marked as no change. The two months are independent samples of a shifting set of sites, and a difference that small is measurement noise.

See the full comparison across every tool, or this tool's complete series.

How the scores fell

This is how 3,915 scans spread across the five score bands in September 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
On-Page SEO Auditn = 3,915
On-Page SEO Audit score distribution in September 2026, median 74/100, from 3,915 scans
On-Page SEO Audit — score distribution, September 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandOn-Page Audit
0–190% · 0
20–392% · 66
40–5921% · 825
60–7947% · 1,822
80–10031% · 1,202
Total runs3,915

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in On-Page SEO Audit scans during September 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Healthy text-to-HTML ratio80%
Content-Security-Policy71%
All images have ALT text62%
Structured data (Schema.org)60%
Open Graph tags58%
Twitter Card56%
HSTS header54%
Title length optimal (30–60)54%
Meta description length (70–160)54%
Exactly one H147%
X-Content-Type-Options47%
Clickjacking protection43%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the On-Page SEO Audit in September 2026, with their rates
On-Page SEO Audit — unmet SeoMods checks, September 2026. From 3,915 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Healthy text-to-HTML ratio80%Partial
Content-Security-Policy71%Partial
All images have ALT text62%Partial
Structured data (Schema.org)60%Partial
Open Graph tags58%Partial
Twitter Card56%Partial
HSTS header54%Partial
Title length optimal (30–60)54%Partial
Meta description length (70–160)54%Partial
Exactly one H147%Partial
X-Content-Type-Options47%Partial
Clickjacking protection43%Partial

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Social & structured data51%
Security21%
Links & Media20%
Meta & Content5%
Performance2%
Technical & Indexability0%

This month’s sample

In September 2026 the On-Page SEO Audit recorded 3,915 successful scans across 3,492 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 86,983 scans covering 22,549 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
On-Page Audit.com 46% · .org 9% · .uk 5% · .it 3% · other 36%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.
  • It is not an organic traffic estimate. No click, impression or visit data goes into it.
  • It does not represent the whole of the real user experience. What is measured is one URL’s HTML and server response at the moment of the scan.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median On-Page SEO Audit score in September 2026?

In September 2026 the median was 74/100 and the mean was 70.7. 31% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in September 2026?

“Healthy text-to-HTML ratio”, which was not met in 80% of scans, followed by “Content-Security-Policy” at 71%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the September 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks, September 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/seo-audit/september-2026.