This is the October 2026 edition of the On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 October 2026 – 31 October 2026
Unique sites3,781
Total scans4,501
Benchmarks / tools1 — On-Page SEO Audit, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on11 November 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

What changed since September 2026

74 → 76 Median score +2 pts
31% → 38% Scored 80+ +7 pp
11.3 → 10.6 Issues per scan −0.7

The biggest check-level move was “Structured data (Schema.org)”, which went from 60% in September 2026 to 45% in October 2026 — it went unmet in a smaller share of this month’s sample.

Reading a monthly difference. The two months are close in size, but they are not the same set of sites. A different mix of sites can move a median and a distribution by itself, so a monthly difference is not a change in scores: it does not show that sites improved or got worse.

CheckNot met thenNot met nowChange
Structured data (Schema.org)60%45%−15 pp
Twitter Card56%46%−10 pp
X-Content-Type-Options47%55%+8 pp
Clickjacking protection43%51%+8 pp
Open Graph tags58%50%−8 pp
Meta description length (70–160)54%46%−8 pp
All images have ALT text62%56%−6 pp
Healthy text-to-HTML ratio80%75%−5 pp
Title length optimal (30–60)54%51%−3 pp
Content-Security-Policy71%70%no change
HSTS header54%55%no change
Change in the share of scans not meeting each SeoMods check on the On-Page SEO Audit between September 2026 and October 2026
On-Page SEO Audit — check-by-check change from September 2026 to October 2026, in percentage points.

Moves under a point are marked as no change. The two months are independent samples of a shifting set of sites, and a difference that small is measurement noise.

See the full comparison across every tool, or this tool's complete series.

How the scores fell

This is how 4,501 scans spread across the five score bands in October 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
On-Page SEO Auditn = 4,501
On-Page SEO Audit score distribution in October 2026, median 76/100, from 4,501 scans
On-Page SEO Audit — score distribution, October 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandOn-Page Audit
0–190% · 0
20–392% · 75
40–5918% · 789
60–7943% · 1,918
80–10038% · 1,719
Total runs4,501

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in On-Page SEO Audit scans during October 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Healthy text-to-HTML ratio75%
Content-Security-Policy70%
All images have ALT text56%
HSTS header55%
X-Content-Type-Options55%
Title length optimal (30–60)51%
Clickjacking protection51%
Open Graph tags50%
Meta description length (70–160)46%
Twitter Card46%
Structured data (Schema.org)45%
Limited inline styles41%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the On-Page SEO Audit in October 2026, with their rates
On-Page SEO Audit — unmet SeoMods checks, October 2026. From 4,501 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Healthy text-to-HTML ratio75%Partial
Content-Security-Policy70%Partial
All images have ALT text56%Partial
HSTS header55%Partial
X-Content-Type-Options55%Partial
Title length optimal (30–60)51%Partial
Clickjacking protection51%Partial
Open Graph tags50%Partial
Meta description length (70–160)46%Partial
Twitter Card46%Partial
Structured data (Schema.org)45%Partial
Limited inline styles41%Partial

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Social & structured data42%
Security27%
Links & Media24%
Meta & Content6%
Performance2%
Technical & Indexability0%

This month’s sample

In October 2026 the On-Page SEO Audit recorded 4,501 successful scans across 3,781 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 89,498 scans covering 22,497 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
On-Page Audit.com 48% · .org 8% · .ir 5% · .uk 4% · other 35%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.
  • It is not an organic traffic estimate. No click, impression or visit data goes into it.
  • It does not represent the whole of the real user experience. What is measured is one URL’s HTML and server response at the moment of the scan.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median On-Page SEO Audit score in October 2026?

In October 2026 the median was 76/100 and the mean was 72.9. 38% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in October 2026?

“Healthy text-to-HTML ratio”, which was not met in 75% of scans, followed by “Content-Security-Policy” at 70%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the October 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks, October 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/seo-audit/october-2026.