This is the August 2026 edition of the On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the On-Page SEO Audit. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 2,550 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. A large group clears the top band while a real tail is left behind, so the median understates how well the leading pages do.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
On-Page SEO Auditn = 2,550
On-Page SEO Audit score distribution in August 2026, median 82/100, from 2,550 scans
On-Page SEO Audit — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandOn-Page Audit
0–190% · 0
20–391% · 29
40–5913% · 320
60–7927% · 696
80–10059% · 1,505
Total runs2,550

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in On-Page SEO Audit scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Healthy text-to-HTML ratio78%
Content-Security-Policy47%
All images have ALT text45%
Title length optimal (30–60)41%
Limited inline styles39%
Structured data (Schema.org)37%
Meta description length (70–160)37%
No broken links36%
Open Graph tags35%
X-Content-Type-Options35%
Exactly one H133%
Clickjacking protection32%
The checks that failed most often on the On-Page SEO Audit in August 2026, with their rates
On-Page SEO Audit — failed checks, August 2026. From 2,550 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
Healthy text-to-HTML ratio78%Partial
Content-Security-Policy47%Partial
All images have ALT text45%Partial
Title length optimal (30–60)41%Partial
Limited inline styles39%Partial
Structured data (Schema.org)37%Partial
Meta description length (70–160)37%Partial
No broken links36%Hard fail
Open Graph tags35%Partial
X-Content-Type-Options35%Partial
Exactly one H133%Partial
Clickjacking protection32%Partial

The weakest areas that month

Social & structured data33%
Links & Media28%
Security15%
Performance14%
Meta & Content9%
Technical & Indexability0%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the On-Page SEO Audit recorded 2,550 successful scans across 1,374 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
On-Page Audit.com 60% · .rs 10% · .org 10% · .io 4% · other 16%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median On-Page SEO Audit score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 82/100 and the mean was 78.6. 59% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“Healthy text-to-HTML ratio”, which did not pass in 78% of scans, followed by “Content-Security-Policy” at 47%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — On-Page SEO Audit benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/seo-audit/august-2026.