This is the September 2026 edition of the LLM Readability Score benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
Unique sites2,227
Total scans2,412
Benchmarks / tools1 — LLM Readability Score, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 October 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

What changed since August 2026

75 → 72 Median score −3 pts
45% → 39% Scored 80+ −6 pp
2.9 → 3.2 Issues per scan +0.3

The biggest check-level move was “Ideal average sentence length”, which went from 35% in August 2026 to 46% in September 2026 — it went unmet in a larger share of this month’s sample.

Reading a monthly difference. Each month is a separate sample, and its size changes from month to month. A change in sample size can move a median and a distribution by itself, so a monthly difference should not be mistaken for a change in scores: it does not show that sites improved or got worse.

CheckNot met thenNot met nowChange
Ideal average sentence length35%46%+11 pp
Reasonable average word length9%17%+8 pp
Few long sentences (>28 words)33%40%+7 pp
Uses lists19%14%−5 pp
Has a summary / TL;DR94%91%−3 pp
Broken into paragraphs10%13%+3 pp
Self-contained short passages7%10%+3 pp
Low share of long/complex words1%4%+3 pp
Varied sentence rhythm6%8%+2 pp
No very long sentences (>40 words)70%71%no change
Healthy lexical variety9%8%no change
Change in the share of scans not meeting each SeoMods check on the LLM Readability Score between August 2026 and September 2026
LLM Readability Score — check-by-check change from August 2026 to September 2026, in percentage points.

Moves under a point are marked as no change. The two months are independent samples of a shifting set of sites, and a difference that small is measurement noise.

See the full comparison across every tool, or this tool's complete series.

How the scores fell

This is how 2,412 scans spread across the five score bands in September 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
LLM Readability Scoren = 2,412
LLM Readability Score score distribution in September 2026, median 72/100, from 2,412 scans
LLM Readability Score — score distribution, September 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandLLM Readability
0–190% · 4
20–393% · 74
40–5934% · 823
60–7924% · 579
80–10039% · 932
Total runs2,412

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in LLM Readability Score scans during September 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Has a summary / TL;DR91%
No very long sentences (>40 words)71%
Ideal average sentence length46%
Few long sentences (>28 words)40%
Reasonable average word length17%
Uses lists14%
Broken into paragraphs13%
Self-contained short passages10%
Healthy lexical variety8%
Varied sentence rhythm8%
Low share of long/complex words4%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the LLM Readability Score in September 2026, with their rates
LLM Readability Score — unmet SeoMods checks, September 2026. From 2,412 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Has a summary / TL;DR91%Partial
No very long sentences (>40 words)71%Hard fail
Ideal average sentence length46%Hard fail
Few long sentences (>28 words)40%Partial
Reasonable average word length17%Partial
Uses lists14%Partial
Broken into paragraphs13%Partial
Self-contained short passages10%Partial
Healthy lexical variety8%Partial
Varied sentence rhythm8%Partial
Low share of long/complex words4%Partial

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Rhythm & Directness47%
Sentence Clarity47%
Chunkability & Structure4%
Vocabulary Simplicity2%

This month’s sample

In September 2026 the LLM Readability Score recorded 2,412 successful scans across 2,227 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 86,983 scans covering 22,549 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
LLM Readability.com 48% · .org 10% · .de 4% · .net 3% · other 35%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a direct measurement of the signals every AI system uses. Which system uses which signal, and how, is not public; the score measures the checks SeoMods chose.
  • It does not measure whether a page is actually cited in AI answers. It measures readiness on the page, not what any assistant returned.
  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median LLM Readability Score score in September 2026?

In September 2026 the median was 72/100 and the mean was 69.8. 39% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in September 2026?

“Has a summary / TL;DR”, which was not met in 91% of scans, followed by “No very long sentences (>40 words)” at 71%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the September 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — LLM Readability Score benchmarks, September 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/llm-readability-score/september-2026.