This is the August 2026 edition of the LLM Readability Score benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 (first recorded scan: 8 August 2026)
Unique sites876
Total scans1,002
Benchmarks / tools1 — LLM Readability Score, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 September 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

This is the first edition for the LLM Readability Score. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,002 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. A large group clears the top band while a real tail is left behind, so the median understates how well the leading pages do.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
LLM Readability Scoren = 1,002
LLM Readability Score score distribution in August 2026, median 75/100, from 1,002 scans
LLM Readability Score — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandLLM Readability
0–190% · 0
20–393% · 28
40–5925% · 251
60–7927% · 269
80–10045% · 454
Total runs1,002

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in LLM Readability Score scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Has a summary / TL;DR94%
No very long sentences (>40 words)70%
Ideal average sentence length35%
Few long sentences (>28 words)33%
Uses lists19%
Broken into paragraphs10%
Reasonable average word length9%
Healthy lexical variety9%
Self-contained short passages7%
Varied sentence rhythm6%
Low share of long/complex words1%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the LLM Readability Score in August 2026, with their rates
LLM Readability Score — unmet SeoMods checks, August 2026. From 1,002 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Has a summary / TL;DR94%Partial
No very long sentences (>40 words)70%Hard fail
Ideal average sentence length35%Hard fail
Few long sentences (>28 words)33%Partial
Uses lists19%Partial
Broken into paragraphs10%Partial
Reasonable average word length9%Partial
Healthy lexical variety9%Partial
Self-contained short passages7%Partial
Varied sentence rhythm6%Partial
Low share of long/complex words1%Partial

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Rhythm & Directness56%
Sentence Clarity41%
Chunkability & Structure3%
Vocabulary Simplicity0%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the LLM Readability Score recorded 1,002 successful scans across 876 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
LLM Readability.com 62% · .io 9% · .org 7% · .ai 3% · other 19%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a direct measurement of the signals every AI system uses. Which system uses which signal, and how, is not public; the score measures the checks SeoMods chose.
  • It does not measure whether a page is actually cited in AI answers. It measures readiness on the page, not what any assistant returned.
  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median LLM Readability Score score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 75/100 and the mean was 73.2. 45% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in August 2026?

“Has a summary / TL;DR”, which was not met in 94% of scans, followed by “No very long sentences (>40 words)” at 70%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — LLM Readability Score benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/llm-readability-score/august-2026.