This is the September 2026 edition of the AI Visibility Checker benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
Unique sites3,494
Total scans3,844
Benchmarks / tools1 — AI Visibility Checker, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 October 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

What changed since August 2026

67 → 59 Median score −8 pts
35% → 24% Scored 80+ −11 pp
5.9 → 6.5 Issues per scan +0.6

The biggest check-level move was “llms.txt present”, which went from 70% in August 2026 to 82% in September 2026 — it went unmet in a larger share of this month’s sample.

Reading a monthly difference. Each month is a separate sample, and its size changes from month to month. A change in sample size can move a median and a distribution by itself, so a monthly difference should not be mistaken for a change in scores: it does not show that sites improved or got worse.

CheckNot met thenNot met nowChange
llms.txt present70%82%+12 pp
Social / sameAs profiles linked41%51%+10 pp
JSON-LD structured data48%57%+9 pp
Organization / WebSite schema53%61%+8 pp
About page linked52%57%+5 pp
Author / byline60%57%−3 pp
In-depth content (≥800 words)37%40%+3 pp
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)33%30%−3 pp
Question-style headings48%50%+2 pp
Cites external sources25%27%+2 pp
Publish / update dates66%67%no change
Change in the share of scans not meeting each SeoMods check on the AI Visibility Checker between August 2026 and September 2026
AI Visibility Checker — check-by-check change from August 2026 to September 2026, in percentage points.

Moves under a point are marked as no change. The two months are independent samples of a shifting set of sites, and a difference that small is measurement noise.

See the full comparison across every tool, or this tool's complete series.

How the scores fell

This is how 3,844 scans spread across the five score bands in September 2026. The spread is wide and fairly even: in this sample sites land at very different levels on this measure.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
AI Visibility Checkern = 3,844
AI Visibility Checker score distribution in September 2026, median 59/100, from 3,844 scans
AI Visibility Checker — score distribution, September 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandAI Visibility
0–1911% · 433
20–3915% · 593
40–5925% · 948
60–7924% · 932
80–10024% · 938
Total runs3,844

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in AI Visibility Checker scans during September 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

llms.txt present82%
Publish / update dates67%
Organization / WebSite schema61%
JSON-LD structured data57%
About page linked57%
Author / byline57%
Social / sameAs profiles linked51%
Question-style headings50%
In-depth content (≥800 words)40%
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)30%
Cites external sources27%
XML sitemap available25%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the AI Visibility Checker in September 2026, with their rates
AI Visibility Checker — unmet SeoMods checks, September 2026. From 3,844 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
llms.txt present82%Partial
Publish / update dates67%Partial
Organization / WebSite schema61%Hard fail
JSON-LD structured data57%Hard fail
About page linked57%Partial
Author / byline57%Partial
Social / sameAs profiles linked51%Partial
Question-style headings50%Partial
In-depth content (≥800 words)40%Partial
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)30%Hard fail
Cites external sources27%Partial
XML sitemap available25%Partial

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Brand & entity strength55%
Trust & freshness23%
AI crawler access14%
Machine-readable content8%

This month’s sample

In September 2026 the AI Visibility Checker recorded 3,844 successful scans across 3,494 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 86,983 scans covering 22,549 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
AI Visibility.com 45% · .org 9% · .uk 5% · .it 4% · other 37%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a direct measurement of the signals every AI system uses. Which system uses which signal, and how, is not public; the score measures the checks SeoMods chose.
  • It does not measure whether a page is actually cited in AI answers. It measures readiness on the page, not what any assistant returned.
  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median AI Visibility Checker score in September 2026?

In September 2026 the median was 59/100 and the mean was 57.2. 24% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in September 2026?

“llms.txt present”, which was not met in 82% of scans, followed by “Publish / update dates” at 67%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the September 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — AI Visibility Checker benchmarks, September 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/ai-visibility-checker/september-2026.