This is the October 2026 edition of the AI Visibility Checker benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 October 2026 – 31 October 2026
Unique sites3,463
Total scans3,803
Benchmarks / tools1 — AI Visibility Checker, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on11 November 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

What changed since September 2026

59 → 68 Median score +9 pts
24% → 29% Scored 80+ +5 pp
6.5 → 5.7 Issues per scan −0.8

The biggest check-level move was “Organization / WebSite schema”, which went from 61% in September 2026 to 48% in October 2026 — it went unmet in a smaller share of this month’s sample.

Reading a monthly difference. The two months are close in size, but they are not the same set of sites. A different mix of sites can move a median and a distribution by itself, so a monthly difference is not a change in scores: it does not show that sites improved or got worse.

CheckNot met thenNot met nowChange
Organization / WebSite schema61%48%−13 pp
JSON-LD structured data57%44%−13 pp
Publish / update dates67%56%−11 pp
About page linked57%48%−9 pp
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)30%23%−7 pp
Social / sameAs profiles linked51%45%−6 pp
llms.txt present82%79%−3 pp
In-depth content (≥800 words)40%37%−3 pp
Question-style headings50%51%no change
XML sitemap available25%26%no change
Author / byline57%57%no change
Change in the share of scans not meeting each SeoMods check on the AI Visibility Checker between September 2026 and October 2026
AI Visibility Checker — check-by-check change from September 2026 to October 2026, in percentage points.

Moves under a point are marked as no change. The two months are independent samples of a shifting set of sites, and a difference that small is measurement noise.

See the full comparison across every tool, or this tool's complete series.

How the scores fell

This is how 3,803 scans spread across the five score bands in October 2026. The spread is wide and fairly even: in this sample sites land at very different levels on this measure.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
AI Visibility Checkern = 3,803
AI Visibility Checker score distribution in October 2026, median 68/100, from 3,803 scans
AI Visibility Checker — score distribution, October 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandAI Visibility
0–198% · 310
20–3913% · 480
40–5917% · 660
60–7933% · 1,255
80–10029% · 1,098
Total runs3,803

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in AI Visibility Checker scans during October 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

llms.txt present79%
Author / byline57%
Publish / update dates56%
Question-style headings51%
Organization / WebSite schema48%
About page linked48%
Social / sameAs profiles linked45%
JSON-LD structured data44%
In-depth content (≥800 words)37%
XML sitemap available26%
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)23%
AI crawlers allowed20%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the AI Visibility Checker in October 2026, with their rates
AI Visibility Checker — unmet SeoMods checks, October 2026. From 3,803 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
llms.txt present79%Partial
Author / byline57%Partial
Publish / update dates56%Partial
Question-style headings51%Partial
Organization / WebSite schema48%Hard fail
About page linked48%Partial
Social / sameAs profiles linked45%Partial
JSON-LD structured data44%Hard fail
In-depth content (≥800 words)37%Partial
XML sitemap available26%Partial
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)23%Hard fail
AI crawlers allowed20%Hard fail

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Brand & entity strength43%
Trust & freshness27%
AI crawler access20%
Machine-readable content10%

This month’s sample

In October 2026 the AI Visibility Checker recorded 3,803 successful scans across 3,463 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 89,498 scans covering 22,497 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
AI Visibility.com 48% · .org 9% · .uk 5% · .io 3% · other 35%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a direct measurement of the signals every AI system uses. Which system uses which signal, and how, is not public; the score measures the checks SeoMods chose.
  • It does not measure whether a page is actually cited in AI answers. It measures readiness on the page, not what any assistant returned.
  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median AI Visibility Checker score in October 2026?

In October 2026 the median was 68/100 and the mean was 62.8. 29% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in October 2026?

“llms.txt present”, which was not met in 79% of scans, followed by “Author / byline” at 57%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the October 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — AI Visibility Checker benchmarks, October 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/ai-visibility-checker/october-2026.