This is the August 2026 edition of the AI Visibility Checker benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the AI Visibility Checker. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,467 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Scores collect at both ends and hollow out in the middle — the mark of a check that has either been done or not done at all, with little partial credit in between.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
AI Visibility Checkern = 1,467
AI Visibility Checker score distribution in August 2026, median 67/100, from 1,467 scans
AI Visibility Checker — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandAI Visibility
0–1910% · 144
20–3917% · 256
40–5913% · 189
60–7925% · 370
80–10035% · 508
Total runs1,467

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in AI Visibility Checker scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

llms.txt present70%
Publish / update dates66%
Author / byline60%
Organization / WebSite schema53%
About page linked52%
JSON-LD structured data48%
Question-style headings48%
Social / sameAs profiles linked41%
In-depth content (≥800 words)37%
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)33%
Cites external sources25%
Concise, quotable passages22%
The checks that failed most often on the AI Visibility Checker in August 2026, with their rates
AI Visibility Checker — failed checks, August 2026. From 1,467 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
llms.txt present70%Partial
Publish / update dates66%Partial
Author / byline60%Partial
Organization / WebSite schema53%Hard fail
About page linked52%Partial
JSON-LD structured data48%Hard fail
Question-style headings48%Partial
Social / sameAs profiles linked41%Partial
In-depth content (≥800 words)37%Partial
Content in raw HTML (server-rendered)33%Hard fail
Cites external sources25%Partial
Concise, quotable passages22%Partial

The weakest areas that month

Brand & entity strength47%
Trust & freshness27%
AI crawler access19%
Machine-readable content7%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the AI Visibility Checker recorded 1,467 successful scans across 1,266 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
AI Visibility.com 62% · .io 7% · .org 7% · .net 3% · other 21%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median AI Visibility Checker score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 67/100 and the mean was 61.8. 35% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“llms.txt present”, which did not pass in 70% of scans, followed by “Publish / update dates” at 66%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — AI Visibility Checker benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/ai-visibility-checker/august-2026.