This is the August 2026 edition of the NLP Content Analyzer benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the NLP Content Analyzer. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 997 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
NLP Content Analyzern = 997
NLP Content Analyzer score distribution in August 2026, median 71/100, from 997 scans
NLP Content Analyzer — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandNLP Analysis
0–192% · 15
20–395% · 51
40–5927% · 273
60–7951% · 513
80–10015% · 145
Total runs997

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in NLP Content Analyzer scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Readable prose83%
No run-on sentences70%
Contains questions46%
Digestible sentence length26%
Concrete facts / numbers22%
Named entities present16%
The checks that failed most often on the NLP Content Analyzer in August 2026, with their rates
NLP Content Analyzer — failed checks, August 2026. From 997 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
Readable prose83%Partial
No run-on sentences70%Partial
Contains questions46%Partial
Digestible sentence length26%Hard fail
Concrete facts / numbers22%Partial
Named entities present16%Hard fail

The weakest areas that month

Structure & Intent60%
Machine Parseability33%
Semantic Signal7%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the NLP Content Analyzer recorded 997 successful scans across 868 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
NLP Analysis.com 60% · .io 9% · .org 8% · .net 3% · other 21%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median NLP Content Analyzer score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 71/100 and the mean was 64.6. 15% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“Readable prose”, which did not pass in 83% of scans, followed by “No run-on sentences” at 70%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — NLP Content Analyzer benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/nlp-analyzer/august-2026.