This is the August 2026 edition of the NLP Content Analyzer benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 (first recorded scan: 8 August 2026)
Unique sites868
Total scans997
Benchmarks / tools1 — NLP Content Analyzer, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 September 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

This is the first edition for the NLP Content Analyzer. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 997 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
NLP Content Analyzern = 997
NLP Content Analyzer score distribution in August 2026, median 71/100, from 997 scans
NLP Content Analyzer — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandNLP Analysis
0–192% · 15
20–395% · 51
40–5927% · 273
60–7951% · 513
80–10015% · 145
Total runs997

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in NLP Content Analyzer scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Readable prose83%
No run-on sentences70%
Contains questions46%
Digestible sentence length26%
Concrete facts / numbers22%
Named entities present16%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the NLP Content Analyzer in August 2026, with their rates
NLP Content Analyzer — unmet SeoMods checks, August 2026. From 997 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Readable prose83%Partial
No run-on sentences70%Partial
Contains questions46%Partial
Digestible sentence length26%Hard fail
Concrete facts / numbers22%Partial
Named entities present16%Hard fail

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Structure & Intent60%
Machine Parseability33%
Semantic Signal7%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the NLP Content Analyzer recorded 997 successful scans across 868 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
NLP Analysis.com 60% · .io 9% · .org 8% · .net 3% · other 21%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a direct measurement of the signals every AI system uses. Which system uses which signal, and how, is not public; the score measures the checks SeoMods chose.
  • It does not measure whether a page is actually cited in AI answers. It measures readiness on the page, not what any assistant returned.
  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median NLP Content Analyzer score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 71/100 and the mean was 64.6. 15% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in August 2026?

“Readable prose”, which was not met in 83% of scans, followed by “No run-on sentences” at 70%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — NLP Content Analyzer benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/nlp-analyzer/august-2026.