This is the August 2026 edition of the GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization). There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,391 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. The spread is wide and fairly even, which is what a measure looks like while it is still being adopted unevenly.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization)n = 1,391
GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) score distribution in August 2026, median 60/100, from 1,391 scans
GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandGEO
0–1920% · 281
20–398% · 116
40–5920% · 284
60–7929% · 410
80–10022% · 300
Total runs1,391

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Summary / TL;DR block88%
Article / BlogPosting schema84%
llms.txt file71%
Freshness dates66%
Author signals61%
Question-style headings57%
Organization / WebSite schema52%
JSON-LD present48%
Comprehensive coverage38%
Server-rendered content33%
Lists / tables29%
Concise, citable passages27%
The checks that failed most often on the GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) in August 2026, with their rates
GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) — failed checks, August 2026. From 1,391 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
Summary / TL;DR block88%Partial
Article / BlogPosting schema84%Partial
llms.txt file71%Partial
Freshness dates66%Partial
Author signals61%Partial
Question-style headings57%Partial
Organization / WebSite schema52%Partial
JSON-LD present48%Hard fail
Comprehensive coverage38%Partial
Server-rendered content33%Hard fail
Lists / tables29%Partial
Concise, citable passages27%Hard fail

The weakest areas that month

Structured data57%
Crawlability for AI16%
Authority & Freshness14%
Quotable Content13%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) recorded 1,391 successful scans across 1,228 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
GEO.com 61% · .io 8% · .org 7% · .net 3% · other 20%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 60/100 and the mean was 55.1. 22% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“Summary / TL;DR block”, which did not pass in 88% of scans, followed by “Article / BlogPosting schema” at 84%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — GEO Checker (Generative Engine Optimization) benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/geo-checker/august-2026.