This is the August 2026 edition of the AI Citation Checker benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the AI Citation Checker. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,499 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. The spread is wide and fairly even, which is what a measure looks like while it is still being adopted unevenly.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
AI Citation Checkern = 1,499
AI Citation Checker score distribution in August 2026, median 46/100, from 1,499 scans
AI Citation Checker — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandAI Citation
0–1927% · 404
20–3916% · 238
40–5926% · 392
60–7923% · 339
80–1008% · 126
Total runs1,499

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in AI Citation Checker scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

FAQ / Q&A schema94%
Publish / update date84%
Expert quotes82%
Named author / byline76%
Question-style headings75%
Statistics & concrete figures69%
Structured data56%
Substantial content (≥700 words)51%
Clear definitions ("X is …")47%
Lists / tables for extractability36%
Concise, standalone passages33%
Outbound citations to sources27%
The checks that failed most often on the AI Citation Checker in August 2026, with their rates
AI Citation Checker — failed checks, August 2026. From 1,499 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
FAQ / Q&A schema94%Partial
Publish / update date84%Partial
Expert quotes82%Partial
Named author / byline76%Partial
Question-style headings75%Partial
Statistics & concrete figures69%Hard fail
Structured data56%Partial
Substantial content (≥700 words)51%Partial
Clear definitions ("X is …")47%Partial
Lists / tables for extractability36%Partial
Concise, standalone passages33%Hard fail
Outbound citations to sources27%Hard fail

The weakest areas that month

Trust Signals (E-E-A-T)48%
Direct Answers32%
Evidence & Data16%
Depth & Quotability3%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the AI Citation Checker recorded 1,499 successful scans across 1,291 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
AI Citation.com 63% · .io 7% · .org 6% · .net 3% · other 20%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median AI Citation Checker score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 46/100 and the mean was 42.2. 8% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“FAQ / Q&A schema”, which did not pass in 94% of scans, followed by “Publish / update date” at 84%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — AI Citation Checker benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/ai-citation-checker/august-2026.