This is the August 2026 edition of the Technical Site Audit (Crawler) benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the Technical Site Audit (Crawler). There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,445 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Scores collect at both ends and hollow out in the middle — the mark of a check that has either been done or not done at all, with little partial credit in between.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
Technical Site Audit (Crawler)n = 1,445
Technical Site Audit (Crawler) score distribution in August 2026, median 67/100, from 1,445 scans
Technical Site Audit (Crawler) — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandSite Crawl
0–1917% · 242
20–3913% · 192
40–5912% · 174
60–7923% · 335
80–10035% · 502
Total runs1,445

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in Technical Site Audit (Crawler) scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Titles are long enough (≥30)73%
Images have ALT text69%
Pages use H2 subheadings66%
Every page has an H156%
All pages have a meta description54%
No broken outbound links43%
No thin-content pages (≥250w)34%
Single H1 per page26%
All pages indexable22%
All pages have a title12%
No redirected links3%
The checks that failed most often on the Technical Site Audit (Crawler) in August 2026, with their rates
Technical Site Audit (Crawler) — failed checks, August 2026. From 1,445 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
Titles are long enough (≥30)73%Partial
Images have ALT text69%Partial
Pages use H2 subheadings66%Partial
Every page has an H156%Hard fail
All pages have a meta description54%Partial
No broken outbound links43%Hard fail
No thin-content pages (≥250w)34%Partial
Single H1 per page26%Partial
All pages indexable22%Hard fail
All pages have a title12%Hard fail
No redirected links3%Partial

The weakest areas that month

Media & links56%
On-page quality44%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the Technical Site Audit (Crawler) recorded 1,445 successful scans across 1,266 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
Site Crawl.com 62% · .io 7% · .org 6% · .net 4% · other 22%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median Technical Site Audit (Crawler) score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 67/100 and the mean was 57.0. 35% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“Titles are long enough (≥30)”, which did not pass in 73% of scans, followed by “Images have ALT text” at 69%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — Technical Site Audit (Crawler) benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/site-audit/august-2026.