This is the August 2026 edition of the Meta Tag Analyzer benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For every published month added together, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed each time a month is added, and the figures here never are.

This edition at a glance
Data period1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 (first recorded scan: 8 August 2026)
Unique sites1,269
Total scans1,453
Benchmarks / tools1 — Meta Tag Analyzer, one of the 25 tools in this edition
Minimum sampleat least 500 scans per tool in the month
Data frozen on2 September 2026

A monthly snapshot does not change after it is published: the figures on this page stay exactly as they were frozen on that date.

This is the first edition for the Meta Tag Analyzer. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,453 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Nearly everything piles into the top band — most sites in this sample meet this measure, so a high score here does not set a page apart.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
Meta Tag Analyzern = 1,453
Meta Tag Analyzer score distribution in August 2026, median 83/100, from 1,453 scans
Meta Tag Analyzer — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandMeta Tags
0–195% · 67
20–3913% · 182
40–598% · 122
60–7913% · 189
80–10061% · 893
Total runs1,453

Which SeoMods checks went unmet

The SeoMods checks that were not met in Meta Tag Analyzer scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Title length (30–60)52%
Meta description length (70–160)51%
Twitter Card39%
Canonical URL35%
Open Graph tags31%
Meta description present27%
Charset declared23%
HTML lang attribute11%
Mobile viewport9%
Title tag present4%
The SeoMods checks most often unmet on the Meta Tag Analyzer in August 2026, with their rates
Meta Tag Analyzer — unmet SeoMods checks, August 2026. From 1,453 scans.
CheckNot met (share of scans)Weight
Title length (30–60)52%Partial
Meta description length (70–160)51%Partial
Twitter Card39%Partial
Canonical URL35%Partial
Open Graph tags31%Partial
Meta description present27%Hard fail
Charset declared23%Partial
HTML lang attribute11%Partial
Mobile viewport9%Hard fail
Title tag present4%Hard fail

The rate is the share of scans in which a SeoMods check was not met. It is SeoMods’ criterion, not Google’s assessment of these pages. “Hard fail” means the check’s full weight is deducted from the SeoMods score; “partial” means part of it.

The weakest areas that month

Title & description58%
Social tags31%
Technical meta11%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the Meta Tag Analyzer recorded 1,453 successful scans across 1,269 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
Meta Tags.com 61% · .org 8% · .io 7% · .net 3% · other 21%

What this score does not measure

  • It is not a Google ranking. A high score does not guarantee a better position, and a low one does not mean Google has penalised the page.
  • It is not a test of compliance with a Google length rule. Google sets no fixed character limit for titles or meta descriptions; the ranges are SeoMods target ranges.
  • It is not an organic traffic estimate. No click, impression or visit data goes into it.

About this benchmark. This benchmark is calculated from data on the sites SeoMods has scanned. The results do not necessarily represent all websites, or a random selection of them. The scores express SeoMods’ own measurement and scoring criteria; they are not ranking, quality, E-E-A-T or AI visibility scores issued by Google. Sample, anonymization and licence: the full methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What was the median Meta Tag Analyzer score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 83/100 and the mean was 74.0. 61% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which SeoMods check went unmet most often in August 2026?

“Title length (30–60)”, which was not met in 52% of scans, followed by “Meta description length (70–160)” at 51%.

Does this page ever change?

Its figures do not. A dated record is only useful if it stays put: someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. The one thing added afterwards is a pointer to the next month's edition once that is published — the data is left exactly as it was. For every published month added together, see this tool's own benchmark page, which is refreshed each time a month is added.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — Meta Tag Analyzer benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/meta-tag-analyzer/august-2026.