This is the August 2026 edition of the Content Freshness Score benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the Content Freshness Score. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 1,448 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. The distribution banks up against the floor: most pages score badly, so even a modest result here puts you ahead of the majority.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
Content Freshness Scoren = 1,448
Content Freshness Score score distribution in August 2026, median 13/100, from 1,448 scans
Content Freshness Score — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandContent Freshness
0–1967% · 977
20–3919% · 282
40–597% · 101
60–795% · 79
80–1001% · 9
Total runs1,448

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in Content Freshness Score scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

"Updated" freshness language97%
Visible date on the page95%
dateModified in structured data89%
datePublished present89%
References the current year79%
No stale year references6%
Recently updated (≤12 months)1%
The checks that failed most often on the Content Freshness Score in August 2026, with their rates
Content Freshness Score — failed checks, August 2026. From 1,448 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
"Updated" freshness language97%Partial
Visible date on the page95%Hard fail
dateModified in structured data89%Hard fail
datePublished present89%Partial
References the current year79%Partial
No stale year references6%Partial
Recently updated (≤12 months)1%Partial

The weakest areas that month

Date Signals91%
Recency9%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the Content Freshness Score recorded 1,448 successful scans across 1,285 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
Content Freshness.com 63% · .io 8% · .org 7% · .net 3% · other 20%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median Content Freshness Score score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 13/100 and the mean was 22.4. 1% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“"Updated" freshness language”, which did not pass in 97% of scans, followed by “Visible date on the page” at 95%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — Content Freshness Score benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/content-freshness-score/august-2026.