This is the August 2026 edition of the AI Content Score benchmarks. Every figure below comes only from scans run inside that month, and none of them will change again — a rate you quote today will still be at this address years from now. For the current picture, go back to the tool's own page: that one is refreshed at every revision, and this one never is.

This is the first edition for the AI Content Score. There is no earlier month to compare against, so these figures are the baseline. Every edition after August 2026 will also show what moved since the one before it.

How the scores fell

This is how 999 scans spread across the five score bands in August 2026. Most results sit in the middle bands, which means sites differ here by degree rather than by whether they bothered at all.

  • 0–19
  • 20–39
  • 40–59
  • 60–79
  • 80–100
AI Content Scoren = 999
AI Content Score score distribution in August 2026, median 64/100, from 999 scans
AI Content Score — score distribution, August 2026. A frozen record, reusable under CC BY 4.0.
Score bandAI Content
0–191% · 7
20–397% · 72
40–5929% · 290
60–7952% · 523
80–10011% · 107
Total runs999

Where sites got stuck

The checks that did not pass in AI Content Score scans during August 2026. What each check means and what to do about it is on the tool's own benchmark page; this page is the record of the month.

Summary / TL;DR94%
Reasonable reading ease83%
Freshness date80%
Author signal74%
Substantial length60%
Question-based sections49%
Structured data43%
Clear sentence length32%
Exactly one clear H129%
Lists / tables19%
Original, varied wording10%
Paragraph structure10%
The checks that failed most often on the AI Content Score in August 2026, with their rates
AI Content Score — failed checks, August 2026. From 999 scans.
CheckDid not passWeight
Summary / TL;DR94%Partial
Reasonable reading ease83%Partial
Freshness date80%Partial
Author signal74%Partial
Substantial length60%Partial
Question-based sections49%Partial
Structured data43%Partial
Clear sentence length32%Partial
Exactly one clear H129%Partial
Lists / tables19%Partial
Original, varied wording10%Partial
Paragraph structure10%Partial

The weakest areas that month

Trust (E-E-A-T)58%
Readability23%
Answer-Friendliness12%
Depth5%
Structure2%

This month’s sample

In August 2026 the AI Content Score recorded 999 successful scans across 901 unique domains. Across the whole series that month there were 34,236 scans covering 5,586 sites.

How the sample is collected, how it is anonymized and where the method's limits lie govern the whole series, so they are set out once in the methodology on the hub.

ToolDomain endings in the sample
AI Content.com 63% · .org 7% · .io 7% · .net 3% · other 19%

Frequently asked questions

What was the median AI Content Score score in August 2026?

In August 2026 the median was 64/100 and the mean was 62.7. 11% of scans reached 80 or above. These figures are frozen and will not change.

Which check failed most often in August 2026?

“Summary / TL;DR”, which did not pass in 94% of scans, followed by “Reasonable reading ease” at 83%.

Why is this page never updated?

Because a dated record is only useful if it stays put. Someone citing the August 2026 figures today has to find the same numbers at the same URL years from now. For the current picture, see this tool's own benchmark page, where the figures are refreshed at every revision.

Citing this edition

The figures on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Suggested citation: SeoMods — AI Content Score benchmarks, August 2026 edition, https://seomods.com/seo-score-benchmarks/ai-content-score/august-2026.